Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

{The List-} Civilizations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • {The List-} Civilizations

    Introduction

    FILL IN note this is just a collection of the ideas I found lying about in old threads- this is NOT YET a collection of ideas from the old list or from Asmodean's list thread)

    [i]Thanks! -List Threadmaster DarkCloud[/b]

    Summary

    FILL IN

    NOTE TO SELF- EDITED UP TO SKYWALKER 03-Jan-2003 19:30

    NOTE TO SELF: Related Threads:
    {The List} Civilization Traits http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...hreadid=105555 Nuclear Master (LOGGED THRU SANDMAN 03-01-2004 20:47)
    {The List} Civilizations http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...hreadid=105331 civilleader (LOGGED THRU NUCLEAR MASTER 03-01-2004 18:39)


    The Ideas


    ----
    1.0.0 Types of Civs
    ----

    1.0.1 Growth-Oriented Civs
    *Growth Oriented civs, with following bonuses : Extra food in town / city / metropolis. Growth oriented improvements twice cheaper.
    -Spiffor

    1.0.2 Proto-Civs
    *The Civilizations should start as tribes, and aren't really considered civs before they complete their palace. This would allow the game to start earlier.
    Before the palace is built, the tribes won't create any culture, though they would be able to create warriors, archers, and such. However, they will also have no scientific advancement since they are little more than nomadic herdsmen who have finally settled down and are just starting to adjust to the rigors of civilization and farming.

    Once palaces are built, the civilizations will overtake the near tribes rapidly, with the villages and encampments turning into small cities
    -Azazel

    1.1.0 Barbarian Civs
    *Barbarians, through capturing cities, could become civilizations themselves, over time. Thus we start with 8-10 civs on the map at the beginning and can end with 16 simultaneous civilizations.
    -narmox

    *Barbarians should be able to capture cities like they did in Civ II and start churning out their own units.
    -Rasputin

    *Barbarians should be able to trade
    -Azazel

    *Barbarians can be hired as mercenaries (Perhaps without a nationality [Like Privateers])
    *Barbarians can rent/loan/sell units
    *And if they are mercs there should be a chance (perhaps modified by your cultural strength and/or how much you paid for them (minimum, moderate, or high)or somethn) that they go independent or even turn against you since they are mercs after all (such as what german mercs did to the Romans occasionally)
    -Kramerman

    *If Barbarian civs don't generate Culture, then perhaps they could gain special Generals (Like Attila the Hun) or a "golden age" which will give them some culture. If they then conquer enough cities they can become a powerful military civ. Then again, if their golden age ends, or the leader dies this empire will likely fall apart.
    -ixnay

    *Instead of giving the Barbarians no culture, don't give them any Civ Attributes... Therefore they'd be weeded out through normal attrition after a short time
    *And if that wasn't enough of a handicap and barbs started overrunning actual Civ's you could give them a slight production handicap.
    -wrylachlan

    1.2.0 Civil Wars
    *In addition, some civilizations (ex: USSR) can split apart (like in Civ II), through a peaceful coup, or a civil war.
    -narmox

    *Which Civs are prone to splitting should be balanced with other characteristics.
    -Brent

    *Civs that can split apart include Spain, England, France, Celts, Romans, Arabs, Germany, Scandinavia.
    Spain can split into Portugal, Mexico, Peru, Argentina, etc.
    England can split into America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa.
    Celts can split into Brittany, Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, Scotland.
    Rome can split into Spain, Italy, France, Romania.
    Arabs can split into Egypt, Iraq.
    Scandinavia can split into Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Faroes, Jutes, Vinland.
    USSR can split into Ukraine, Belarus, Siberia, Kamchatka.
    America can split into Texas, California, Union, Confederacy.
    Germany can split into Austria, Switzerland, Bavaria, Saxony, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, West Germany, East Germany.
    -Brent

    Aztecs-Teotihuacans-Olmec
    Inca-Tiahuacanos-Moche
    English-Americans-Canadians
    Russians-Polish-Mongols
    Greeks-Romans-Minoans
    Egyptians-Assyrians-Babylonians
    French-German-Spanish
    Sioux-Iroqoius-Navaho
    Chinese-Japanese-Korean
    Indians-Siamese-Khmer
    -The List for Civ III

    *All civs should have a chance of revolt if their capital is taken (as per civ2.)
    For example: The USA could split into Yankees and Confederates, etc...
    -Rasputin

    *There should be at least two rebel groups for every civilization
    -Stefu

    1.3.0 Combo-Civs
    *Close allies should be able to join each others civilization if the civs are much alike (examples: the member-nations of the USSR, or the EU)
    -DarkCloud

    1.4.0 Civ-Creation
    *If we could customize our own civs, then we wouldn't need more civs. The player should be able to add traits, give civs abilities, etc. from the New Game setup screen... Not just from the editor.
    -Rasputin

    *You should be able to choose attributes, your cultural group (asian, european, arab, mediteranian, african, american), your Unique Units (im hoping there are at least one more UU per civ, if not a UU for each civ for each age), etc.
    And all this should be possible because this game is about building a civilization form the ground up, right?
    -Kramerman

    *Why don't we do it RPG style ? Give us a hell load of points to start with, distribute them over various characteristics (like: agricultural: 1000, militaristic: 2000, scientific: 1500, environment-conscious, religious etc....) which will give you certain advantages and you can improve these characteristics throughout the game (like if you build lots of farms you get more experience in agriculture; if you conquered two continents in less than half a century, you get to a militaristic level when all new units are produced with a +5 morale; etc.). And that will be your own civilization.
    And if you're like me and can't make up your mind as how to distribute the damn points, you could choose a 'real world' civ with an all-made-up-just-for-you distribution exactly the way it's done in Empire Earth.
    -Kirastos

    1.5.0 Renaming Civs
    *Give civilizations the option to rename themselves when they advance to a new era. Each civ can have suggested names to switch to for each era. For example:

    Babylon -> Iraq
    Persia -> Iran
    Gaul -> Franks -> France
    -ixnay

    1.6.0 Voluntarily Splitting Civs
    *I'd like to have the option to create civs out of your own civ. So if your nation becomes too rowdy, you can seperate a part of civ and rebuild your nation.
    If your Civ is on the verge of revolting against you, you can just cut off the rowdy cities so you can work on making the ones you have better.

    -Frozzy

    1.7.0 New Tribes
    *New tribes should probably appear periodically
    -Mercator

    1.8.0 Hardcoded Numbers of Civs
    *There shouldn't be a hardcoded max number of civs - just say "over this number, we don't support whatever happens".
    -skywalker


    ----
    2.0.0 Rulers
    ----

    2.1.0 Choosing Rulers
    *Every civ could have two different rulers available for being chosen as the civ's leader.
    (Example: Americans - George Washington and Woodrow Wilson.)
    -Rasbelin

    *There should be (Like Civ II) both a Male and a Female Leader for each nation
    -POTUS

    2.2.0 Ruler Traits
    *Each ruler should have his or her own traits which affect the way they play the game.
    -Brent

    *Each ruler's traits should effect a civilization's traits. For example:
    Stalin could have an Authoritarian trait to add to Russia's hypothetical Merchant/Green traits.
    -DarkCloud

    *Basically, what I was thinking was that the leaders could work much like they work in Europa Universalis...
    Each Civ would have an infinite number of leaders that possess certain traits such as:

    Admistration (1-5 Star) [Increases Tax Efficiency, Cheapness of Buildings, Reduces Corruption]
    Military (1-5 Star) [Increases Cheapness of Units, Reduces Penalty for War and Distance from Home city]
    Diplomacy (1-5 Star) [-25%,-10%,0%,+10%,+25% Relations with all computer civs; Decreases the cost for purchasing merc units from other civs, Allows you to transgress borders for an extra 2-3 turns]

    Some of the leaders can be historical, but perhaps there are not enough famous generals/politicans for every time period in every nation, therefore a random name generator will be necessary for the game.

    I believe that this will add a lot to Civ-strategy.
    However in contrast to the List's previous suggestion, I would like to posit forth that these 'Leaders' should not be able to "run the civilization" for the player since we don't want to take too much power out of the player's hands by letting the AI take over management.

    -DarkCloud

    2.3.0 Changing Rulers
    *Like in the game Europa Universalis, the Leaders for each civilization should change after x amount of years (to be randomly determined).
    *The names for these rulers could be randomly generated.
    *Each ruler would have traits like civilisations do in Civ III. For example: one ruler could be conservative and pressing (ala Margaret Thatcher), or changing and friendly (ala Mikhail Gorbachev), or militaristic and fascist (ala Adolf Hitler).
    -Fozzy,DarkCloud

    2.4.0 Ruler Graphic Design
    *If animated leaders are used, add support for static leaderheads in picture format, as opposed to the still-flcs necessary to make static leaderheads in civ3.



    -----
    3.0.0 Colonies
    -----

    3.0.1 Colonies As Air Bases
    *Colonies should be counted as air bases. You own them, they're outside of your territory and they are semi cities...so why can't you land planes there?
    -Jer8m8


    -----
    4.0.0 Immigration
    -----

    *Immigration/ Emigration. I once sent a post on another pre-CIV3 forum somewhere where I wanted this issue debated. CIV3 already has parts of it: if you conquer an enemy city, e.g the Greeks its inhabitants will still be greek for some while, happy or not. Now what would happen if the greeks could actually send people into your cities as workers whenever you're not at war, for example if your city is close to the greek borders. What if any civilization could do that? The city status window could show a diagram of the city population demographics, saying "90% Romans, 5% Greek, 2% Babylonians" or so. Those cities with more than, say, 20% foreign inhabitants could likely fall into disorder when a war erputs, or anytime on higher difficulty levels... restrictive/repressive governments (Communism? Despotism?) might throw out "unwanted" foreigners, thus decreasing city sizes... of course, YOU (the player) could send your own people to foreign cities... they would leave anyway if they don't like the way you govern the country, adding up to your competitor's city sizes... spies could only plant propaganda in cities holding inhabitants of your civilization (they can barely hide with people which language they don't speak or so)...
    -Cozy_22303

    *Migration between cities of the same Civ
    -Brent

    *Allow some sort of ethnic purging, or allow some ability to expel ethnic groups from your civ if they grow too rowdy.
    -Shogun Gunner


    ----
    5.0.0 Nation's Compositions
    ----

    5.1.0 Minorities
    *You should be able to set up specific policies concerning how you treat your minority populations - do you tolerate them, promote a multicultural society, try to assimilate them or persecute them?
    *Perhaps you should only be able to set policies about minority groups comprising 20% of any individual city's population or 5% of your civilization's population, just so that this system does not become too unweildly.

    -Stefu


    ----
    6.0.0 Proposed Civ Lists
    ----

    6.1.0 More Balanced (Asian, Africans Included) (37 civs)
    Americans
    Iroquois
    Aztecs
    Mayans
    Incas
    French
    Germans
    English
    Celts
    Spanish
    Romans
    Greeks
    Russians
    Norsemen
    Dutch
    Portuguese
    Hungarians
    Turks
    Arabs
    Hebrews
    Babylonians
    Assyrians
    Persians
    Egyptians
    Carthagians
    Ethiopians
    Mali (or possibly some other West African civ of the era - Songhay, Dahomey etc.)
    Zulus
    Mongols
    Indians
    Vietnamese
    Siamese
    Koreans
    Chinese
    Khitai
    Japanese
    Javans
    -Stefu

    6.2.0 Add-on to Conquests' Civs
    *Besides the civs that are in Conquests, I strongly agree on including the Hebrews and Ethiopians. Many small ancient Middle Eastern civilizations can be added.
    -Brent

    *The first thing period should be: every civ in civ3+ptw+conquests should carry over.
    -Q Cubed

    6.3.0 The Grand List of Proposed Civilizations (61 Civs) (39 if the 'maybes' are taken out)

    The Americas (11)
    Iroquois
    Americans
    *Sioux/Lakota
    Mayas
    Aztecs
    Incas
    *Nazca (maybe)
    *Inuit (maybe)
    *Utes (maybe)
    *Anasazi (maybe)
    *Mississippians/Mound Builders (maybe)

    West Europe: (11)
    English
    France
    Spain
    Portugal
    Germany
    Netherlands/Dutch
    Vikings
    *Sweden
    *Ireland (maybe)
    *Italy (maybe) (ed: We already have Rome)
    Celts

    Eastern Europe: (3)
    Russia
    *Poland (maybe)
    *Austria (since they had alot of slavs) (maybe)

    Mediterranean: (4)
    Rome
    Greece
    Carthage
    Egypt
    Byzantine (maybe)

    Africa: (7)
    *Shonghai
    *Ashanti
    *Mali
    *Ethiopia
    Zulu
    *Xhosa (maybe)
    *Bantu or Kenya or Tanzania (maybe)

    Middle East: (9)
    Arabs
    Turkey/Ottoman Empire
    Persia
    *Israel/Hebrew (maybe)
    *Numbia (maybe)
    Babylon
    *Assyria
    Sumeria
    Hittite

    South/Southeast Asia (6)
    India
    *Harappa (maybe)
    *Khemer (maybe)
    *Indonesia/ Majaphit empire
    *Thailand (maybe)
    *Champa (maybe)

    Far East Asia: (6)
    China
    Japan
    Korea
    Mongolia
    *Tibet (or should this go with south asia?) (maybe)
    *Dai Viet (Vietnamese civ) (maybe)

    For Oceania: (3)
    *Polynesians
    *Maori (maybe)
    *Aborigiese (ed-Can we really count this as a 'civ'... from my understanding, they weren't that civilized... and Plotinus backs me up on this: "I'd have thought that the definition of a civilisation - at least from the point of view of this game - involves some degree of urbanisation." And frankly I think that Civilization has to do with movement from Hunter/Gatherer to Farming.


    *All Civilizations marked with a * are new civilizations not already in Civ3, PTW, C3C
    -civilleader/Nuclear Master

    6.3.1 Anti-Byzantine
    *I hate to say it but I really don't want Byzantium again, they are Greeks in the location where the ottomans need to be
    -civilleader

    6.4.0 More than just names
    I'd favour more civs, so long as its not just a CtP style list of names that makes your eventual choice meaningless
    -joncha

    6.5.0 Criteria for the Inclusion of Civs
    Civs should be included not just did because they played a role in the history of civilization (because which culture hasn't?) but can you give them a specialization that has some historical importance and add to game play in a unique way
    -joncha

    6.6.0 Adding Israel Should Open Doors/ A Mandate for Adding Civs
    *But if Israel were to be included then the mandate for including other civs which were not dominant or don't rule their own territory would be opened. How about a Kurd, Basque, or Rom/Rum civ
    -EnduringBlue

    6.7.0 The "Overkill" Civ List (66 Civs)

    American (11)

    USA
    Inuit
    Sioux
    Iroquois
    Hopewell
    Mississippian
    Anasazi
    Aztec
    Olmec
    Maya
    Inca

    Europe (14)

    Portugal
    Spain
    Basque
    France
    Dutch
    Germany
    English
    Scandinavia
    Goths
    Celts
    Rome
    Russia
    Austria
    Greece

    Africa (4)

    Carthage
    Egypt
    Ethiopia
    Zulu

    Near East (16)

    Egypt
    Israel
    Moab
    Canaan
    Arabia
    Hittites
    Phoenicians
    Assyria
    Babylon
    Sumer
    Persia
    Kurdistan
    Crete
    Ammon
    Midian
    Troy

    Central Asia (4)

    Turkey
    Turkmenistan
    Mongolia
    India

    Far East (7)

    Tibet
    Tocharia
    China
    Korea
    Japan
    Ainu
    Java

    Oceania (3)

    Australian Aborigines (ed: see my comments on this in 6.3.0)
    Maori
    Hawaiians
    -Brent

    6.8.0 A Civ-Creating Philosophy
    To me the most important reason for more civs is to have thew designers pregenerate names for the cities. Different abilities are not so important to me, and maybe if we do get 200 civs we should do away with abilities. If there aren't 200 pregenerated civs, at least makke it easy to store that many and use them conveniently, and if there are 200, have space for 100 custom ones.
    -Brent

    6.9.0 Adding Too Many Civs
    CON
    *Each civ, if Included, should have Unique Units, Unique Traits, Unique City Names and Unique Ruler Names (although some face-heads could possible be grayed out... therefore, since we want each civ to be unique-
    Why bother putting in fifty redundant civs?
    -DarkCloud/skywalker

    PRO
    *Frankly, if there are dozens and dozens of Civs, then I'm not concerned if some are just like others. I can pick a group of Civs out for their strategic pros and cons, and then select among that group for less tangible reasons.

    *What I would like to see in Civ 4 are a greater spread of Civ traits and their effects (even degrees... a little agricultural or a lot?), and a huge number of Civs that I think are "cool" and "deserve" to be in. Any ancient Civilization that we know about should be in, no matter how minor they wound up being. Those Civs deserve a place long before America, anyhow.
    -Fosse


    NOTE: CONTINUED ON PAGE 2... TODO: PLACE LINK HERE TO CONTINUATION
    Last edited by DarkCloud; January 4, 2004, 18:02.
    -->Visit CGN!
    -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

  • #2
    1.0.2 Barbarian Civs

    Are the Traits of Barbarian Civs something we need to address?

    1.0.3 Civil Wars

    Which Civs are prone to splitting should be balanced with other characteristics. Civs that can split apart include Spain, England, France, Celts, Romans, Arabs, Germany, Scandinavia. Spain can split into Portugal, Mexico, Peru, Argentina, etc. England can split into America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa. Celts can split into Brittany, Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, Scotland. Rome can split into Spain, Italy, France, Romania. Arabs can split into Egypt, Iraq. Germany can split into Austria, Switzerland. Scandinavia can split into Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Faroes, Jutes, Vinland.

    1.2.0 Civilization Traits

    How many Traits should there be, and how many should each civ have? Should one Trait be able to fill two slots?

    2.0.1 Rulers

    Should at least one of each Civ's two available Rulers be male? Should each ruler have his or her own traits which affect the way they play the game?

    4.0.0 Immigration

    What about migration between cities of the same Civ?

    Comment


    • #3
      more civilizations, but they start as tribes, and aren't really considered civs before they complete their palace. The game would start earlier. before the palace the tribes won't create any culture, though they would be able to create warriors archers, and such -> no science.

      once palaces are built, the civilizations will overtake the near tribes rapidly, with the villages and encampments turning into small cities.
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • #4
        the ability of barbarians to capture citys must be reinstigated as per civ 2.... once captured they can then just churn out more barbs..


        all civs should have a chance of revolt if capital taken again as per civ2. split usa into yankees and confederates etc....


        Dont need any more civs added cause we can should be able to customize them, add our own traits , give them own abiltiys etc..
        from setup screen not from editor.
        GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

        Comment


        • #5
          More Civs

          I want the official people to do the work of designing more civs.

          1.0.3 Civil Wars

          USSR can split into Ukraine, Belarus, Siberia, Kamchatka. America can split into Texas, California. Germany can split into Bavaria, Saxony, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein.

          1.1.1 Allies Joining into Supranational Force

          England, Germany, France, etc can merge together.

          Comment


          • #6
            1.2.0.1 With each change of government, the civ can change the traits (like social engineering in AC). Example: communist revolution in Russia, made that country be militaristic, industrial, may be scientific as well.
            1.2.0.2 Different governments might have different number of traits, and may be some of them are fixed. Example Communist government must have militaristic trait, can not have agricultural trait, and can chose to other traits
            1.2.0.3. Some wonders of the world can either give the trait, or give opportunity to add one, or freely change the traits for some time.
            The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
            certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
            -- Bertrand Russell

            Comment


            • #7
              2.0.1
              Every civilization should have at least two, maybe three, leaders, and at least one should be of each gender, like Civ II. I no longer want to have to be Joan of Arc to play the French.
              Vote Democrat
              Support Democracy

              Comment


              • #8
                2.0.1

                Each civilisation has a different ruler every so often (either when the civ is in a bad patch or something). Name is made up. The person has traits like the civilisations in that one could be conservative and pressing (ala Margaret Thatcher), or changing an friendly (ala Mikhail Gorbachev), or militaristic and fascist (ala Adolf Hitler).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Technology

                  In the Ancient Age, built in Civs should have their own tech trees. They can be partially the same as the trees of other Civs. Parts of the trees correspond with an entire culture group. Maybe even let there be more than one tree for each civ during the Ancient Age, the civ- specific one very limited and one of the other trees corresponds to the culture group and the other is universal. When two civs meet, eachothers' tech trees become available. Different culture groups have different writing technologies, such as pictographs, glyphs, hieroglyphs, cuneiform, alphabet, and syllabary. Writing does not become available to the American culture group until late in the Ancient Age.

                  The Scientific Civ Trait can provide slightly quicker research like the University in SMAC.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    MORE CIVS!
                    MORE CIV ATTRIBUTES!

                    there should be a huge list of civ attributes, more than the 9 or 10 they have (including the ones added in COnquest)

                    you could add a lot (i dont know a lot off the top of my head) like offensive or defensive, sedentary or roaming(forget the proper word), forest dwellers, mountain dwellers, or plain dwellers, urban or rural, nature fairing or nature exploiting (or perhaps industrious or environmental) etc, etc. ANd like the old attributes, each should give the civ some small bonus.

                    These would be the inherent attributes of your civ, that you could possibly alter during gameplay slightly by using the SMAC-like social engineering and government choosing which would give penalties and bonuses like that of the inherent civ attributes

                    And then each civ should have like 4 or 5 or 10 speacial attributes out of a list of as many as they can come up with, instead of just 2. I think this would make gameplay much more interesting and make each civ much more uniques


                    CUSTOM CIV!
                    you should be able to customize a civ at a game start if you wish. Choosing however many attributes you are allowed, choosing your cultural group (asian, european, arab, mediteranian, african, american), choosing your UUs from hte list (im hoping there are at least one more UU per civ, if not a UU for each civ for each age), etc. Again, just basically customizing your own civ if you wanted to. cause, i mean, this game is about building a civilization form the ground up, right?
                    "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                    - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                    Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Azazel
                      more civilizations, but they start as tribes, and aren't really considered civs before they complete their palace. The game would start earlier. before the palace the tribes won't create any culture, though they would be able to create warriors archers, and such -> no science.

                      once palaces are built, the civilizations will overtake the near tribes rapidly, with the villages and encampments turning into small cities.
                      i really like this idea
                      "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                      - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                      Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        instead of having a bunch of barbarian camps, they should have a bunch (but not enarly as many, obviously) of small barbarian 'civs'

                        these civs would be able to build 'villages' and have limited research and stuff (based on war basically), but at a much slower rate due to their barbarian culture. wouldnt be able to irrigate or mine or anyhting like that probably. their towns should produce warriors of whatever tech they are one (warrior, short swordsmen, spearmen, broad swrodsmen, etc) as well as pirate ships if they area coastal town

                        oh, and you should be able to hire them as mercaneries maybe, or bribe them if they might sack one of your cities. and if they do sack a city, there SHOULD be a decent chance that they take and hold the city as their own!
                        "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                        - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                        Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I personally like my idea better, ( ), Kramerman, since this avoids putting some fake barrier between civ tribes, and barb tribes. civs should be just very well advanced tribes.
                          urgh.NSFW

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            yeah me too, except how will the barbarians ever get the tech to build beyond archers and warriors, or the tech to build ships?
                            "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                            - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                            Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I want small civilizations. IIRC they were at one time supposed to be in Civ3. I also want immigration and a closer emphasis on the nationality. You should be able to set up specific policies concerning how you treat your minority populations - do you tolerate them, promote a multicultural society, try to assimilate them or persecute them? (However, if you're a cosmopolitan civilization with people from all the other civs in, this could get unwieldy. Perhaps only set policies concerning a few important minorities?)

                              Also, I want more African civs and Asian civs - in general, more non-Western civs. A proposed Civ list:

                              Americans
                              Iroquois
                              Aztecs
                              Mayans
                              Incas
                              French
                              Germans
                              English
                              Celts
                              Spanish
                              Romans
                              Greeks
                              Russians
                              Norsemen
                              Dutch
                              Portuguese
                              Hungarians
                              Turks
                              Arabs
                              Hebrews
                              Babylonians
                              Assyrians
                              Persians
                              Egyptians
                              Carthagians
                              Ethiopians
                              Mali (or possibly some other West African civ of the era - Songhay, Dahomey etc.)
                              Zulus
                              Mongols
                              Indians
                              Vietnamese
                              Siamese
                              Koreans
                              Chinese
                              Khitai
                              Japanese
                              Javans

                              There should also be at least two rebellers for each civ, able to break off from the civilization and form a small, independent country. And plent of small countries, which can for independently.
                              "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
                              "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X